↓ Skip to main content

Public Perceptions of Risk and Preference-Based Values of Safety

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, November 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Public Perceptions of Risk and Preference-Based Values of Safety
Published in
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, November 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1020962104810
Authors

Susan Chilton, Judith Covey, Lorraine Hopkins, Michael Jones-Lee, Graham Loomes, Nick Pidgeon, Anne Spencer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 4%
Czechia 1 2%
Malaysia 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 42 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 21%
Student > Master 7 15%
Other 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 10 21%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11 23%
Social Sciences 9 19%
Engineering 5 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 6%
Environmental Science 3 6%
Other 11 23%
Unknown 6 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2012.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
#190
of 418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,443
of 52,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 52,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them