↓ Skip to main content

Modeled responses of terrestrial ecosystems to elevated atmospheric CO2: a comparison of simulations by the biogeochemistry models of the Vegetation/Ecosystem Modeling and Analysis Project (VEMAP)

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, April 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modeled responses of terrestrial ecosystems to elevated atmospheric CO2: a comparison of simulations by the biogeochemistry models of the Vegetation/Ecosystem Modeling and Analysis Project (VEMAP)
Published in
Oecologia, April 1998
DOI 10.1007/s004420050462
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yude Pan, Jerry M. Melillo, A. David McGuire, David W. Kicklighter, Louis F. Pitelka, Kathy Hibbard, Lars L. Pierce, Steven W. Running, Dennis S. Ojima, William J. Parton, David S. Schimel, Other VEMAP members

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Germany 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 98 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 25%
Professor 19 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 13 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 44 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 15%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 <1%
Arts and Humanities 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 18 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2000.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,774
of 4,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,370
of 32,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 32,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.