| Title |
The programming of sequences of saccades
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Experimental Brain Research, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00221-019-05481-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eugene McSorley, Iain D. Gilchrist, Rachel McCloy |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 16% |
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 21% |
| Unknown | 10 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 13 | 23% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2019.
All research outputs
#20,554,592
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#2,934
of 3,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#370,105
of 437,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#37
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.