| Title |
BIOCLAIMS standard diet (BIOsd): a reference diet for nutritional physiology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genes & Nutrition, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12263-011-0262-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Femke P. M. Hoevenaars, Evert M. van Schothorst, Olga Horakova, Anja Voigt, Martin Rossmeisl, Catalina Pico, Antoni Caimari, Jan Kopecky, Susanne Klaus, Jaap Keijer |
| Abstract |
Experimental replication is fundamental for practicing science. To reduce variability, it is essential to control sources of variation as much as possible. Diet is an important factor that can influence many processes and functional outcomes in studies performed with rodent models. This is especially true for, but not limited to, nutritional studies. To compare functional effects of different nutrients, it is important to use standardized, semi-purified diets. Here, we propose and describe a standard reference diet, the BIOCLAIMS standard diet. The diet is AIN-93 based, but further defined with dietary and experimental requirements taken into account that allow for experiments with bioactive food components and natural (non-expensive) labeling. This diet will be implemented by two European research consortia, Mitofood and BIOCLAIMS, to ensure inter-laboratory comparability. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 30 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 34% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 16% |
| Professor | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 22% |
| Unknown | 5 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2022.
All research outputs
#7,463,719
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from Genes & Nutrition
#143
of 388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,390
of 242,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genes & Nutrition
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.