↓ Skip to main content

Suicidal ideation in patients undergoing brain tumor surgery: prevalence and risk factors

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Suicidal ideation in patients undergoing brain tumor surgery: prevalence and risk factors
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00520-016-3117-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aiste Pranckeviciene, Sarunas Tamasauskas, Vytenis Pranas Deltuva, Robertas Bunevicius, Arimantas Tamasauskas, Adomas Bunevicius

Abstract

Suicidal ideation (SI) is an important complication in cancer patients that should be promptly recognized and adequately managed. We investigated the prevalence rate and correlates of pre-operative SI in brain tumor (BT) patients admitted for elective BT surgery. Two hundred and eleven consecutive patients (70 % women; mean age 55.9 ± 15.4 years) scheduled for BT surgery were evaluated for SI ("suicidal thought" item from the Beck Depression Inventory-II), depressive/anxiety symptom severity (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS)), health-related quality of life (SF-36 scale), functional status (Barthel Index), and psychiatric histories and treatments. The majority of patients were diagnosed with meningioma (39 %) and high-grade glioma (17 %). SI was self-reported by 12 (6 %) patients. Patients expressing SI were most commonly diagnosed with meningioma (50 %). Patients with SI were more likely to have a past history of psychiatric disorders, scored higher on the HADS anxiety subscale, and reported worse health-related quality of life across physical and mental health domains. In multivariate regression analyses, worse perceived mental health was associated with increased risk for SI independently from clinical, sociodemographic, and other patient-oriented variables considered in the study. SI was self-reported by 6 % of BT patients before surgical intervention and was associated with a past history of psychiatric disorders and worse perceived health status. Poor mental health was an independent correlate of SI. The perception of health status by a patient should be considered as an important determinant of poor mental health in BT patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 16%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 24 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 26 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2016.
All research outputs
#4,183,555
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#961
of 4,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,109
of 400,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#28
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.