↓ Skip to main content

Competing, complementary and co-existing paradigms in techno-scientific literature: A case study of Nanotechnology for engineering

Overview of attention for article published in Scientometrics, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Competing, complementary and co-existing paradigms in techno-scientific literature: A case study of Nanotechnology for engineering
Published in
Scientometrics, February 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11192-019-03013-2
Authors

Thara Prabhakaran, Hiran H. Lathabai, Susan George

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Researcher 3 16%
Librarian 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Lecturer 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 21%
Engineering 2 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 7 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2019.
All research outputs
#20,554,592
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#2,520
of 2,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#370,593
of 438,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#45
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.