You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bordetella pertussis epidemiology and evolution in the light of pertussis resurgence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Infection, Genetics & Evolution, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.meegid.2016.02.032 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katie L. Sealey, Thomas Belcher, Andrew Preston |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 122 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Researcher | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 28 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 22 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 29 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,799,086
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Infection, Genetics & Evolution
#245
of 2,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,017
of 311,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection, Genetics & Evolution
#6
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.