↓ Skip to main content

DNA barcoding and molecular systematics of the benthic and demersal organisms of the CEAMARC survey

Overview of attention for article published in Polar Science, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
DNA barcoding and molecular systematics of the benthic and demersal organisms of the CEAMARC survey
Published in
Polar Science, August 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.polar.2011.02.002
Authors

Agnes Dettai, Sarah J. Adamowizc, Louise Allcock, Claudia P. Arango, David K.A. Barnes, Iain Barratt, Anne Chenuil, Arnaud Couloux, Corinne Cruaud, Bruno David, Françoise Denis, Gael Denys, Angie Díaz, Marc Eléaume, Jean-Pierre Féral, Aurélie Froger, Cyril Gallut, Rachel Grant, Huw J. Griffiths, Christoph Held, Lenaïg G. Hemery, Graham Hosie, Piotr Kuklinski, Guillaume Lecointre, Katrin Linse, Pierre Lozouet, Christopher Mah, Françoise Monniot, Mark D. Norman, Timothy O’Hara, Catherine Ozouf-Costaz, Claire Piedallu, Benjamin Pierrat, Elie Poulin, Nicolas Puillandre, Martin Riddle, Sarah Samadi, Thomas Saucède, Christoph Schubart, Peter J. Smith, Darren W. Stevens, Dirk Steinke, Jan M. Strugnell, K. Tarnowska, Victoria Wadley, Nadia Ameziane

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 4 4%
Belgium 3 3%
Brazil 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 93 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 15%
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 8 8%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 15 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 50%
Environmental Science 15 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 5%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 18 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2019.
All research outputs
#19,942,887
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Polar Science
#183
of 268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,516
of 130,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Polar Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them