| Title |
Low food availability during gestation enhances offspring post-natal growth, but reduces survival, in a viviparous lizard
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00442-019-04349-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Botterill-James, Kirke L. Munch, Ben Halliwell, David G. Chapple, Michael G. Gardner, Erik Wapstra, Geoffrey M. While |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 11 | 34% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 22% |
| United States | 3 | 9% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 6 | 19% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 56% |
| Scientists | 12 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 15% |
| Researcher | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 12% |
| Psychology | 2 | 8% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,883,006
of 24,832,302 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#238
of 4,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,454
of 448,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#5
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,832,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.