| Title |
Reconstructing Body Size in Extinct Crown Cetacea (Neoceti) Using Allometry, Phylogenetic Methods and Tests from the Fossil Record
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Mammalian Evolution, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10914-011-9170-1 |
| Authors |
Nicholas D. Pyenson, Simon N. Sponberg |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Chile | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Argentina | 2 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 98 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 15% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 13 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 46% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 26 | 24% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2019.
All research outputs
#4,183,555
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mammalian Evolution
#140
of 436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,420
of 124,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mammalian Evolution
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 436 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them