You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Counting India's Wild Tigers Reliably
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.332.6031.791-a |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
K. Ullas Karanth, Arjun M. Gopalaswamy, N. Samba Kumar, Mohan Delampady, James D. Nichols, John Seidensticker, Barry R. Noon, Stuart L. Pimm |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Librarian | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 42 | 64% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 12% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 42 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2022.
All research outputs
#4,760,513
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Science
#40,962
of 82,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,414
of 121,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#277
of 458 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 458 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.