| Title |
Phylogenetic relationships of Chinese Adiantum based on five plastid markers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Plant Research, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10265-011-0441-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jin-Mei Lu, Jun Wen, Sue Lutz, Yi-Ping Wang, De-Zhu Li |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| China | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 33 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 22% |
| Professor | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 17% |
| Unknown | 6 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 72% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 6 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2020.
All research outputs
#7,472,947
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Plant Research
#196
of 830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,196
of 119,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Plant Research
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 830 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.