| Title |
Fever control in critically ill adults. An individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-019-05553-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul J. Young, Rinaldo Bellomo, Gordon R. Bernard, Daniel J. Niven, Frederique Schortgen, Manoj Saxena, Richard Beasley, Mark Weatherall |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 119 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 16 | 13% |
| New Zealand | 5 | 4% |
| Colombia | 4 | 3% |
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| Australia | 4 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 3 | 3% |
| Italy | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 14% |
| Unknown | 44 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 80 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 24 | 20% |
| Scientists | 13 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 24% |
| Unknown | 20 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 48% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 24 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 82. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2021.
All research outputs
#516,464
of 25,382,250 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#475
of 5,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,365
of 459,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#18
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,250 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,395 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.