↓ Skip to main content

All 0–1 polytopes are traveling salesman polytopes

Overview of attention for article published in Combinatorica, June 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
All 0–1 polytopes are traveling salesman polytopes
Published in
Combinatorica, June 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf01844844
Authors

Louis J. Billera, A. Sarangarajan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Student > Master 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 4 67%
Computer Science 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2018.
All research outputs
#18,439,846
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from Combinatorica
#244
of 271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,695
of 27,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Combinatorica
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 271 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 27,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.