↓ Skip to main content

Using in operando diffraction to relate lattice strain with degradation mechanism in a NMC battery

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Science, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Using in operando diffraction to relate lattice strain with degradation mechanism in a NMC battery
Published in
Journal of Materials Science, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10853-018-3007-8
Authors

Shikhar Krishn Jha, Harry Charalambous, John S. Okasinski, Thomas Tsakalakos

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 29%
Researcher 4 13%
Professor 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 11 35%
Chemical Engineering 2 6%
Energy 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Chemistry 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 10 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2019.
All research outputs
#18,667,638
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#3,977
of 4,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,411
of 346,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#22
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,642 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.