| Title |
Different analysis methods of Scottish and English child physical activity data explain the majority of the difference between the national prevalence estimates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-019-6517-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chloë Williamson, Paul Kelly, Tessa Strain |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 30 | 42% |
| United States | 5 | 7% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 28 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 44% |
| Scientists | 27 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 8 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Psychology | 2 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 12 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2019.
All research outputs
#811,219
of 25,366,663 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#847
of 17,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,761
of 459,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#27
of 299 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,366,663 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 299 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.