| Title |
Coping with climate change: limited behavioral responses to hot weather in a tropical carnivore
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00442-018-04329-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
D. Rabaiotti, Rosie Woodroffe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 183 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 24 | 13% |
| United States | 20 | 11% |
| Australia | 10 | 5% |
| Japan | 7 | 4% |
| South Africa | 3 | 2% |
| Kenya | 3 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 1% |
| Nepal | 2 | 1% |
| Finland | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Unknown | 89 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 121 | 66% |
| Scientists | 53 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 158 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 14% |
| Researcher | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unknown | 43 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 54 | 34% |
| Environmental Science | 32 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 47 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 130. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2023.
All research outputs
#325,355
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#19
of 4,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,540
of 459,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#1
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,603 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.