↓ Skip to main content

STXBP1 encephalopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Neurology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
13 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
251 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
STXBP1 encephalopathy
Published in
Neurology, February 2016
DOI 10.1212/wnl.0000000000002457
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hannah Stamberger, Marina Nikanorova, Marjolein H Willemsen, Patrizia Accorsi, Marco Angriman, Hartmut Baier, Ira Benkel-Herrenbrueck, Valérie Benoit, Mauro Budetta, Almuth Caliebe, Gaetano Cantalupo, Giuseppe Capovilla, Gianluca Casara, Carolina Courage, Marie Deprez, Anne Destrée, Robertino Dilena, Corrie E Erasmus, Madeleine Fannemel, Roar Fjær, Lucio Giordano, Katherine L Helbig, Henrike O Heyne, Joerg Klepper, Gerhard J Kluger, Damien Lederer, Monica Lodi, Oliver Maier, Andreas Merkenschlager, Nina Michelberger, Carlo Minetti, Hiltrud Muhle, Judith Phalin, Keri Ramsey, Antonino Romeo, Jens Schallner, Ina Schanze, Marwan Shinawi, Kristel Sleegers, Katalin Sterbova, Steffen Syrbe, Monica Traverso, Andreas Tzschach, Peter Uldall, Rudy Van Coster, Helene Verhelst, Maurizio Viri, Susan Winter, Markus Wolff, Martin Zenker, Leonardo Zoccante, Peter De Jonghe, Ingo Helbig, Pasquale Striano, Johannes R Lemke, Rikke S Møller, Sarah Weckhuysen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 100 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 17%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 21 21%
Unknown 27 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 30%
Neuroscience 16 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 7%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 29 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,257,792
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Neurology
#2,158
of 21,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,596
of 415,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurology
#37
of 270 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 270 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.