You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Microbial bile salt hydrolases mediate the efficacy of faecal microbiota transplant in the treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Gut, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317842 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Benjamin H Mullish, Julie A K McDonald, Alexandros Pechlivanis, Jessica R Allegretti, Dina Kao, Grace F Barker, Diya Kapila, Elaine O Petrof, Susan A Joyce, Cormac G M Gahan, Izabela Glegola-Madejska, Horace R T Williams, Elaine Holmes, Thomas B Clarke, Mark R Thursz, Julian R Marchesi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 24% |
| United States | 3 | 12% |
| Australia | 2 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Israel | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Greece | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 56% |
| Scientists | 6 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 187 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 19% |
| Researcher | 27 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Unknown | 62 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 16% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 27 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 12% |
| Unknown | 68 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2022.
All research outputs
#689,515
of 24,407,785 outputs
Outputs from Gut
#410
of 7,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,359
of 453,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gut
#11
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,407,785 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.