| Title |
Team players against headache: multidisciplinary treatment of primary headaches and medication overuse headache
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Headache and Pain, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10194-011-0364-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charly Gaul, Corine M. Visscher, Rhia Bhola, Marjolijn J. Sorbi, Federica Galli, Annette V. Rasmussen, Rigmor Jensen |
| Abstract |
Multidisciplinary approaches are gaining acceptance in headache treatment. However, there is a lack of scientific data about the efficacy of various strategies and their combinations offered by physiotherapists, physicians, psychologists and headache nurses. Therefore, an international platform for more intense collaboration between these professions and between headache centers is needed. Our aims were to establish closer collaboration and an interchange of knowledge between headache care providers and different disciplines. A scientific session focusing on multidisciplinary headache management was organised at The European Headache and Migraine Trust International Congress (EHMTIC) 2010 in Nice. A summary of the contributions and the discussion is presented. It was concluded that effective multidisciplinary headache treatment can reduce headache frequency and burden of disease, as well as the risk for medication overuse headache. The significant value of physiotherapy, education in headache schools, and implementation of strategies of cognitive behavioural therapy was highlighted and the way paved for future studies and international collaboration. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 6 | 33% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 94% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 150 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
| Researcher | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 32 | 21% |
| Unknown | 39 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 16% |
| Psychology | 13 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 43 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2015.
All research outputs
#2,512,137
of 24,777,509 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Headache and Pain
#317
of 1,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,757
of 123,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Headache and Pain
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,777,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,495 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them