↓ Skip to main content

Anisotropy and Shape Optimal Design of Shells by the Polar–Isogeometric Approach

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 616)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Anisotropy and Shape Optimal Design of Shells by the Polar–Isogeometric Approach
Published in
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, November 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10957-018-1425-z
Authors

Dossou Felix Kpadonou, Christian Fourcade, Paul de Nazelle, Paolo Vannucci

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Student > Master 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 67%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2019.
All research outputs
#4,713,167
of 23,873,054 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications
#11
of 616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,993
of 354,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,873,054 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 616 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them