↓ Skip to main content

Impacts of Waste from Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations on Water Quality

Overview of attention for article published in EHP toxicogenomics journal of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
6 policy sources
twitter
28 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
14 Facebook pages
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
361 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
660 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impacts of Waste from Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations on Water Quality
Published in
EHP toxicogenomics journal of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, November 2006
DOI 10.1289/ehp.8839
Pubmed ID
Authors

JoAnn Burkholder, Bob Libra, Peter Weyer, Susan Heathcote, Dana Kolpin, Peter S. Thorne, Michael Wichman

Abstract

Waste from agricultural livestock operations has been a long-standing concern with respect to contamination of water resources, particularly in terms of nutrient pollution. However, the recent growth of concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) presents a greater risk to water quality because of both the increased volume of waste and to contaminants that may be present (e.g., antibiotics and other veterinary drugs) that may have both environmental and public health importance. Based on available data, generally accepted livestock waste management practices do not adequately or effectively protect water resources from contamination with excessive nutrients, microbial pathogens, and pharmaceuticals present in the waste. Impacts on surface water sources and wildlife have been documented in many agricultural areas in the United States. Potential impacts on human and environmental health from long-term inadvertent exposure to water contaminated with pharmaceuticals and other compounds are a growing public concern. This work-group, which is part of the Conference on Environmental Health Impacts of Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations: Anticipating Hazards--Searching for Solutions, identified needs for rigorous ecosystem monitoring in the vicinity of CAFOs and for improved characterization of major toxicants affecting the environment and human health. Last, there is a need to promote and enforce best practices to minimize inputs of nutrients and toxicants from CAFOs into freshwater and marine ecosystems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 660 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 640 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 133 20%
Student > Bachelor 95 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 91 14%
Researcher 76 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 39 6%
Other 99 15%
Unknown 127 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 147 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 122 18%
Engineering 64 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 28 4%
Other 116 18%
Unknown 155 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 163. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#253,498
of 25,623,883 outputs
Outputs from EHP toxicogenomics journal of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
#270
of 8,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#353
of 86,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EHP toxicogenomics journal of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
#3
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,623,883 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.