| Title |
Prompting Patients with Poorly Controlled Diabetes to Identify Visit Priorities Before Primary Care Visits: a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-018-4756-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michelle T. Vo, Connie S. Uratsu, Karen R. Estacio, Andrea Altschuler, Eileen Kim, Stacey E. Alexeeff, Alyce S. Adams, Julie A. Schmittdiel, Michele Heisler, Richard W. Grant |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 80% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 134 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 25 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Researcher | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 19% |
| Unknown | 38 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 25 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 14% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 44 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,774,893
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2,061
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,075
of 451,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#44
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.