↓ Skip to main content

Protective Role of Religious Involvement Against Depression and Suicidal Ideation Among Youth with Interpersonal Problems

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Religion and Health, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
Title
Protective Role of Religious Involvement Against Depression and Suicidal Ideation Among Youth with Interpersonal Problems
Published in
Journal of Religion and Health, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10943-016-0194-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yasmin C. Cole-Lewis, Polly Y. Gipson, Kiel J. Opperman, Alejandra Arango, Cheryl A. King

Abstract

This study examined religious involvement-private religious practices (PRP), organizational religiousness (OR), and religious support (RS)-in relation to depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation (SI) and its protective role, considering youths' school and parent-family connectedness. Youth, ages 12-15 (n = 161), were screened for peer victimization, bullying perpetration, and low social connectedness, and assessed for depressive symptoms, SI, school connectedness, parent-family connectedness, and religious involvement. Results indicated PRP and RS were associated with lower levels of depressive symptoms; PRP and OR were associated with less SI. Controlling for connectedness, PRP remained associated with less SI only. Results suggest the importance of considering religious involvement as a target of youth depression and suicide prevention interventions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Unknown 176 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 24 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 11%
Researcher 13 7%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 52 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 59 33%
Social Sciences 20 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 55 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2017.
All research outputs
#7,189,362
of 25,109,453 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Religion and Health
#352
of 1,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,672
of 412,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Religion and Health
#11
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,109,453 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.