| Title |
Zanzibar and Indian Ocean trade in the first millennium CE: the glass bead evidence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12520-015-0310-z |
| Authors |
Marilee Wood, Serena Panighello, Emilio F. Orsega, Peter Robertshaw, Johannes T. van Elteren, Alison Crowther, Mark Horton, Nicole Boivin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 4 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 18% |
| United States | 2 | 9% |
| Chile | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 86% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
| Professor | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 10 | 26% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 5% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 12 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,064,726
of 25,708,267 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#157
of 966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,743
of 405,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,708,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.