↓ Skip to main content

Dogs and foxes in Early-Middle Bronze Age funerary structures in the northeast of the Iberian Peninsula: human control of canid diet at the sites of Can Roqueta (Barcelona) and Minferri (Lleida)

Overview of attention for article published in Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 971)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
19 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
87 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Dogs and foxes in Early-Middle Bronze Age funerary structures in the northeast of the Iberian Peninsula: human control of canid diet at the sites of Can Roqueta (Barcelona) and Minferri (Lleida)
Published in
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12520-019-00781-z
Authors

Aurora Grandal-d’Anglade, Silvia Albizuri, Ariadna Nieto, Tona Majó, Bibiana Agustí, Natalia Alonso, Ferran Antolín, Joan B. López, Andreu Moya, Alba Rodríguez, Antoni Palomo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 87 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 24%
Student > Master 9 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 17 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 20%
Environmental Science 3 6%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 12 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 232. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#166,735
of 25,768,270 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#10
of 971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,444
of 449,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#1
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,768,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.