You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Particle Diffusometry: An Optical Detection Method for Vibrio cholerae Presence in Environmental Water Samples
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-018-38056-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katherine N. Clayton, Taylor J. Moehling, Dong Hoon Lee, Steven T. Wereley, Jacqueline C. Linnes, Tamara L. Kinzer-Ursem |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 23 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 22 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 3% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 24 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,805,984
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#23,940
of 125,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,070
of 445,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#905
of 3,964 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,964 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.