↓ Skip to main content

The Mental and Physical Health of Homeless Youth: A Literature Review

Overview of attention for article published in Child Psychiatry & Human Development, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
331 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
429 Mendeley
Title
The Mental and Physical Health of Homeless Youth: A Literature Review
Published in
Child Psychiatry & Human Development, November 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10578-011-0270-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer P. Edidin, Zoe Ganim, Scott J. Hunter, Niranjan S. Karnik

Abstract

Youth homelessness is a growing concern in the United States. Despite difficulties studying this population due to inconsistent definitions of what it means to be a youth and homeless, the current body of research indicates that abuse, family breakdown, and disruptive family relationships are common contributing factors to youth homelessness. Moreover, the experience of homelessness appears to have numerous adverse implications and to affect neurocognitive development and academics, as well as mental and physical health. Substance use, sexually transmitted infections, and psychiatric disorders are particularly prevalent in this population. Whereas some of these problems may be short-lived, the chronic stress and deprivation associated with homelessness may have long-term effects on development and functioning. Further, difficulties accessing adequate and developmentally-appropriate health care contribute to more serious health concerns. Suggestions for future research and interventions are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 429 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Unknown 427 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 100 23%
Student > Bachelor 61 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 8%
Researcher 34 8%
Other 60 14%
Unknown 93 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 97 23%
Psychology 87 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 52 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 9%
Arts and Humanities 12 3%
Other 35 8%
Unknown 108 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2016.
All research outputs
#5,090,449
of 24,717,821 outputs
Outputs from Child Psychiatry & Human Development
#211
of 980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,451
of 249,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child Psychiatry & Human Development
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,821 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 980 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.