| Title |
Biodiversity outcomes of payment for ecosystem services: lessons from páramo grasslands
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-019-01700-3 |
| Authors |
Leah L. Bremer, Kathleen A. Farley, Nathan DeMaagd, Esteban Suárez, Daisy Cárate Tandalla, Sebastián Vasco Tapia, Patricio Mena Vásconez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 20% |
| Czechia | 1 | 20% |
| Philippines | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 114 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 19% |
| Researcher | 21 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 22 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 36 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 23 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2021.
All research outputs
#5,802,784
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#829
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,257
of 451,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#20
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.