| Title |
Exposure to glyphosate-based herbicides and risk for non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A meta-analysis and supporting evidence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.mrrev.2019.02.001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luoping Zhang, Iemaan Rana, Rachel M Shaffer, Emanuela Taioli, Lianne Sheppard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,295 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 275 | 12% |
| Colombia | 227 | 10% |
| United States | 195 | 8% |
| Germany | 55 | 2% |
| Canada | 45 | 2% |
| Spain | 44 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 39 | 2% |
| Argentina | 28 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 27 | 1% |
| Other | 209 | 9% |
| Unknown | 1151 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2105 | 92% |
| Scientists | 96 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 60 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 32 | 1% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 485 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 485 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 68 | 14% |
| Researcher | 61 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 57 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 9% |
| Other | 31 | 6% |
| Other | 69 | 14% |
| Unknown | 155 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 62 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 40 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 38 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 22 | 5% |
| Other | 115 | 24% |
| Unknown | 170 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2934. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,319
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research
#1
of 204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29
of 457,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them