↓ Skip to main content

Exposure to glyphosate-based herbicides and risk for non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A meta-analysis and supporting evidence

Overview of attention for article published in Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 204)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
224 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
476 Mendeley
Title
Exposure to glyphosate-based herbicides and risk for non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A meta-analysis and supporting evidence
Published in
Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research, February 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.mrrev.2019.02.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luoping Zhang, Iemaan Rana, Rachel M Shaffer, Emanuela Taioli, Lianne Sheppard

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,296 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 476 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 476 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 65 14%
Researcher 60 13%
Student > Master 56 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 9%
Other 31 7%
Other 68 14%
Unknown 155 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 13%
Environmental Science 39 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 8%
Chemistry 21 4%
Other 110 23%
Unknown 170 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2935. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,296
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research
#1
of 204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29
of 456,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them