You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reimagining the potential of Earth observations for ecosystem service assessments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science of the Total Environment, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.150 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carlos Ramirez-Reyes, Kate A Brauman, Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer, Gillian L Galford, Susana B Adamo, Christopher B Anderson, Clarissa Anderson, Ginger R H Allington, Kenneth J Bagstad, Michael T Coe, Anna F Cord, Laura E Dee, Rachelle K Gould, Meha Jain, Virginia A Kowal, Frank E Muller-Karger, Jessica Norriss, Peter Potapov, Jiangxiao Qiu, Jesse T Rieb, Brian E Robinson, Leah H Samberg, Nagendra Singh, Sabrina H Szeto, Brian Voigt, Keri Watson, T Maxwell Wright |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 43% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 5% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 65% |
| Scientists | 11 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 220 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 48 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Professor | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 37 | 17% |
| Unknown | 51 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 59 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 14% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 20 | 9% |
| Engineering | 15 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 9% |
| Unknown | 71 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,370,524
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Science of the Total Environment
#1,848
of 29,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,041
of 457,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science of the Total Environment
#51
of 668 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 668 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.