↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of different types of exercises on global cognition in adults with mild cognitive impairment: a network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy of different types of exercises on global cognition in adults with mild cognitive impairment: a network meta-analysis
Published in
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, February 2019
DOI 10.1007/s40520-019-01142-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shuo Wang, Huiru Yin, Xinxin Wang, Yong Jia, Chunyan Wang, Lisheng Wang, Li Chen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 116 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Researcher 9 8%
Student > Master 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 47 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 15 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 9%
Sports and Recreations 9 8%
Psychology 7 6%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 58 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2019.
All research outputs
#3,562,978
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#278
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,067
of 452,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#11
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.