↓ Skip to main content

The Classification of Spaces Defining Gravitational Fields

Overview of attention for article published in General Relativity and Gravitation, August 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
The Classification of Spaces Defining Gravitational Fields
Published in
General Relativity and Gravitation, August 2000
DOI 10.1023/a:1001910908054
Authors

A. Z. Petrov

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 24%
Other 3 18%
Professor 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 11 65%
Mathematics 3 18%
Computer Science 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2019.
All research outputs
#7,917,073
of 23,857,313 outputs
Outputs from General Relativity and Gravitation
#285
of 1,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,697
of 38,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from General Relativity and Gravitation
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,857,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,448 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.