↓ Skip to main content

Modified interpretation criteria significantly improve performance of commercially available confirmatory assays for the serodiagnosis of Lyme borreliosis: a case-control study with clinically…

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Modified interpretation criteria significantly improve performance of commercially available confirmatory assays for the serodiagnosis of Lyme borreliosis: a case-control study with clinically defined serum samples
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, February 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10096-018-03455-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ulrike Hauser

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Unspecified 2 10%
Librarian 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Other 6 30%
Unknown 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 35%
Unspecified 2 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 4 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2019.
All research outputs
#15,033,722
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#1,814
of 2,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,115
of 438,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#34
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.