You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials on physical interventions for lateral epicondylalgia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Sports Medicine, June 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bjsm.2004.016170 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
L Bisset, A Paungmali, B Vicenzino, E Beller |
| Abstract |
A systematic review of the literature on the effectiveness of physical interventions for lateral epicondylalgia (tennis elbow) was carried out. Seventy six randomised controlled trials were identified, 28 of which satisfied the minimum criteria for meta-analysis. The evidence suggests that extracorporeal shock wave therapy is not beneficial in the treatment of tennis elbow. There is a lack of evidence for the long term benefit of physical interventions in general. However, further research with long term follow up into manipulation and exercise as treatments is indicated. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Australia | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 686 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 664 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 131 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 91 | 13% |
| Other | 82 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 56 | 8% |
| Researcher | 55 | 8% |
| Other | 162 | 24% |
| Unknown | 109 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 335 | 49% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 107 | 16% |
| Sports and Recreations | 50 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 1% |
| Other | 42 | 6% |
| Unknown | 126 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,760,214
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#3,174
of 6,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,789
of 67,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#11
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.