You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Distinguishing recent dispersal from historical genetic connectivity in the coastal California gnatcatcher
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-018-37712-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amy G. Vandergast, Barbara E. Kus, Kristine L. Preston, Kelly R. Barr |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 20% |
| Unknown | 10 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2019.
All research outputs
#3,334,627
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#28,765
of 125,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,529
of 438,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,058
of 3,808 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,808 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.