| Title |
Lack of adverse effects in subchronic and chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity studies on the glyphosate-resistant genetically modified maize NK603 in Wistar Han RCC rats
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Toxicology, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00204-019-02400-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pablo Steinberg, Hilko van der Voet, Paul W. Goedhart, Gijs Kleter, Esther J. Kok, Maria Pla, Anna Nadal, Dagmar Zeljenková, Radka Aláčová, Júlia Babincová, Eva Rollerová, Soňa Jaďuďová, Anton Kebis, Elena Szabova, Jana Tulinská, Aurélia Líšková, Melinda Takácsová, Miroslava Lehotská Mikušová, Zora Krivošíková, Armin Spök, Monica Racovita, Huib de Vriend, Roger Alison, Clare Alison, Wolfgang Baumgärtner, Kathrin Becker, Charlotte Lempp, Marion Schmicke, Dieter Schrenk, Annette Pöting, Joachim Schiemann, Ralf Wilhelm |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 593 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 90 | 15% |
| Spain | 37 | 6% |
| France | 28 | 5% |
| Canada | 28 | 5% |
| Germany | 24 | 4% |
| Mexico | 22 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 19 | 3% |
| Argentina | 12 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 74 | 12% |
| Unknown | 251 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 483 | 81% |
| Scientists | 89 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 23 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 29 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 456. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2023.
All research outputs
#61,316
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#4
of 2,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,280
of 464,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 464,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.