↓ Skip to main content

A robust Bayesian genome-based median regression model

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical and Applied Genetics, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
A robust Bayesian genome-based median regression model
Published in
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, February 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00122-019-03303-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abelardo Montesinos-López, Osval A. Montesinos-López, Enrique R. Villa-Diharce, Daniel Gianola, José Crossa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 25%
Researcher 3 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Unknown 5 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 50%
Mathematics 1 8%
Unknown 5 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2019.
All research outputs
#15,492,086
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#2,834
of 3,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,114
of 450,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#36
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,565 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.