| Title |
A fluorometric aptamer method for kanamycin by applying a dual amplification strategy and using double Y-shaped DNA probes on a gold bar and on magnetite nanoparticles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microchimica Acta, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00604-018-3207-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kai Zhang, Jinxuan Cao, Yongxiang Wu, Futao Hu, Tianhua Li, Ying Wang, Ning Gan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
| Researcher | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 11 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 8% |
| Engineering | 2 | 8% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 12 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2019.
All research outputs
#20,554,592
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Microchimica Acta
#1,042
of 1,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#371,532
of 438,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microchimica Acta
#18
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,406 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.