↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of Central Fatigue by the Critical Flicker Fusion Threshold in Cyclists

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Systems, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of Central Fatigue by the Critical Flicker Fusion Threshold in Cyclists
Published in
Journal of Medical Systems, February 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10916-019-1170-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez, Montaña Diaz-Manzano

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 20%
Professor 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 12 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 14 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Neuroscience 3 7%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 12 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2019.
All research outputs
#18,667,638
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Systems
#824
of 1,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#324,121
of 438,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Systems
#16
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,166 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.