↓ Skip to main content

Use of combined hormonal contraceptives among women with systemic lupus erythematosus with and without medical contraindications to oestrogen

Overview of attention for article published in Rheumatology, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of combined hormonal contraceptives among women with systemic lupus erythematosus with and without medical contraindications to oestrogen
Published in
Rheumatology, February 2019
DOI 10.1093/rheumatology/kez014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arielle Mendel, Sasha Bernatsky, Christian A Pineau, Yvan St-Pierre, John G Hanly, Murray B Urowitz, Ann E Clarke, Juanita Romero-Diaz, Caroline Gordon, Sang-Cheol Bae, Daniel J Wallace, Joan T Merrill, Jill Buyon, David A Isenberg, Anisur Rahman, Ellen M Ginzler, Michelle Petri, Mary Anne Dooley, Paul Fortin, Dafna D Gladman, Kristján Steinsson, Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman, Munther A Khamashta, Cynthia Aranow, Meggan Mackay, Graciela Alarcón, Susan Manzi, Ola Nived, Andreas Jönsen, Asad A Zoma, Ronald F van Vollenhoven, Manuel Ramos-Casals, Giuillermo Ruiz-Irastorza, Sam Lim, Kenneth C Kalunian, Murat Inanc, Diane L Kamen, Christine A Peschken, Søren Jacobsen, Anca Askanase, Jorge Sanchez-Guerrero, Ian N Bruce, Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau, Evelyne Vinet

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Researcher 5 7%
Student > Master 5 7%
Professor 4 6%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 35 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 37 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,231,727
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Rheumatology
#794
of 6,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,033
of 439,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rheumatology
#24
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.