| Title |
An Improved Method for Differentiating Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells into Cerebellar Purkinje Neurons
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Cerebellum, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12311-019-1007-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher J. Alexander, John A. Hammer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 17% |
| Researcher | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 30% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 10% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2019.
All research outputs
#6,292,836
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from The Cerebellum
#139
of 957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,597
of 443,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Cerebellum
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 957 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.