Title |
Neanderthal plant use and pyrotechnology: phytolith analysis from Roc de Marsal, France
|
---|---|
Published in |
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, February 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12520-019-00793-9 |
Authors |
Kristen Wroth, Dan Cabanes, John M. Marston, Vera Aldeias, Dennis Sandgathe, Alain Turq, Paul Goldberg, Harold L. Dibble |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | 25% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 11% |
Australia | 2 | 6% |
Canada | 2 | 6% |
Norway | 2 | 6% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 3% |
France | 1 | 3% |
Spain | 1 | 3% |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 11 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 22 | 61% |
Scientists | 12 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 20% |
Researcher | 10 | 20% |
Professor | 7 | 14% |
Lecturer | 4 | 8% |
Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
Other | 8 | 16% |
Unknown | 8 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Arts and Humanities | 14 | 27% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 10% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Unknown | 18 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,737,805
of 25,425,223 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#119
of 955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,766
of 458,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#5
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,425,223 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.