↓ Skip to main content

In vitro detection of in vitro secondary mechanisms of genotoxicity induced by engineered nanomaterials

Overview of attention for article published in Particle and Fibre Toxicology, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
In vitro detection of in vitro secondary mechanisms of genotoxicity induced by engineered nanomaterials
Published in
Particle and Fibre Toxicology, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12989-019-0291-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen J. Evans, Martin J. D. Clift, Neenu Singh, John W. Wills, Nicole Hondow, Thomas S. Wilkinson, Michael J. Burgum, Andy P. Brown, Gareth J. Jenkins, Shareen H. Doak

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 10 22%
Unknown 13 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Engineering 3 7%
Materials Science 2 4%
Other 10 22%
Unknown 14 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2019.
All research outputs
#6,200,625
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Particle and Fibre Toxicology
#200
of 565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,901
of 447,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Particle and Fibre Toxicology
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 565 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.