| Title |
Clinical, Electroencephalographic Features and Prognostic Factors of Cefepime-Induced Neurotoxicity: A Retrospective Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neurocritical Care, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12028-019-00682-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Han-Tao Li, Chih-Hong Lee, Tony Wu, Mei-Yun Cheng, Wei-En Johnny Tseng, Chun-Wei Chang, Hsiang-Yao Hsieh, Hsing-I Chiang, Chih-Yin Lin, Bao-Luen Chang, Wey-Ran Lin, Siew-Na Lim |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 25% |
| Spain | 2 | 10% |
| Argentina | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Philippines | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 60% |
| Scientists | 4 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 19% |
| Unknown | 30 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 28% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 37 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2019.
All research outputs
#3,560,496
of 25,466,764 outputs
Outputs from Neurocritical Care
#342
of 1,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,054
of 458,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurocritical Care
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,466,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.