↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of two different intraosseous access methods in a physician-staffed helicopter emergency medical service – a quality assurance study

Overview of attention for article published in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of two different intraosseous access methods in a physician-staffed helicopter emergency medical service – a quality assurance study
Published in
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13049-019-0594-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Renate Sørgjerd, Geir Arne Sunde, Jon-Kenneth Heltne

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 19%
Researcher 8 9%
Unspecified 5 6%
Student > Master 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 3%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 39 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 21 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 20%
Unspecified 5 6%
Engineering 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 35 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2019.
All research outputs
#2,752,287
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#289
of 1,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,434
of 447,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#10
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.