| Title |
Addressing quality in mixed methods research: a review and recommendations for a future agenda
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Quality & Quantity, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11135-016-0449-4 |
| Authors |
Sergi Fàbregues, José F. Molina-Azorín |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 36% |
| Ireland | 3 | 21% |
| Spain | 3 | 21% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 71% |
| Scientists | 3 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 173 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 14% |
| Researcher | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 17% |
| Unknown | 33 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 40 | 23% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 16 | 9% |
| Psychology | 16 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 35 | 20% |
| Unknown | 44 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2019.
All research outputs
#3,366,576
of 24,552,012 outputs
Outputs from Quality & Quantity
#58
of 676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,851
of 322,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality & Quantity
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,552,012 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 676 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.