| Title |
Improving our conservation genetic toolkit: ddRAD-seq for SNPs in snow leopards
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics Resources, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12686-019-01082-2 |
| Authors |
Safia Janjua, Jeffrey L. Peters, Byron Weckworth, Fakhar I. Abbas, Volker Bahn, Orjan Johansson, Thomas P. Rooney |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 28% |
| Canada | 3 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Georgia | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 58% |
| Scientists | 13 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 20 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 21 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,626,511
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics Resources
#5
of 362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,715
of 460,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics Resources
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 362 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them