↓ Skip to main content

Histoplasmosis, an under diagnosed disease affecting people living with HIV/AIDS in Brazil: results of a multicenter prospective cohort study using both classical mycology tests and Histoplasma urine…

Overview of attention for article published in Open Forum Infectious Diseases, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
33 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Histoplasmosis, an under diagnosed disease affecting people living with HIV/AIDS in Brazil: results of a multicenter prospective cohort study using both classical mycology tests and Histoplasma urine antigen detection
Published in
Open Forum Infectious Diseases, April 2019
DOI 10.1093/ofid/ofz073
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diego R Falci, Alexandre A Monteiro, Cassia Ferreira Braz Caurio, Tulio C O Magalhães, Melissa O Xavier, Rossana P Basso, Marineide Melo, Alexandre V Schwarzbold, Paulo Roberto Abrão Ferreira, José Ernesto Vidal Bermudes, João Paulo Marochi, Cassia Silva de Miranda Godoy, Renata de Bastos Ascenco Soares, Aurea Paste, Monica B Bay, Vera Lucia Pereira-Chiccola, Lisandra Serra Damasceno, Terezinha do Menino Jesus Silva Leitão, Alessandro C Pasqualotto

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 108 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 6%
Researcher 6 6%
Professor 4 4%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 47 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 48 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,621,768
of 25,416,581 outputs
Outputs from Open Forum Infectious Diseases
#718
of 4,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,302
of 366,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open Forum Infectious Diseases
#26
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,416,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.